Welcome to the IdeaMatt blog!

My rebooted blog on tech, creative ideas, digital citizenship, and life as an experiment.

Monday
Nov262007

Genius, purpose, and cool job descriptions - What are *you* built to do?

Over the past year or so I've been collecting job descriptions I think are tres cool, i.e., stimulating to me. I'm sure this started when I was planting the seeds of my career change - when I was actively thinking about finding my "thing," what Dick Richards calls our genius (see Is Your Genius at Work?: 4 Key Questions to Ask Before Your Next Career Move - Dwayne's got a nice article on it here).

I worked through that book a while ago, but I'll admit it was difficult and I didn't get it down to two words. (What I love about Richards' approach is he has you get it down to one gerund - a verb that ends with the suffix ing - and one noun, e.g., Digging Deeper.)

Reflecting on this process after some time, I've realized two things. First, my primary motivation for doing personal productivity consulting is to help people free up their minds so their genius can come through - either by making space to hear what it is, or by turning their smart ideas into action [1]. This is the big picture, and the main reason to get on top of everything.

The second realization is that my personal one (Richards says you only have one - I disagree) is something like this (apologies for the dry language):
  1. Read tons of books.
  2. Discover ideas that can potentially change personal world views - radically.
  3. Experiment with them on myself.
  4. Teach the most valuable ones to others.
Provide terrific value to others, add money, and repeat. (Haven't got it down to two words, obviously ;-)

So - here are some of the more interesting job descriptions. Do any of them give you ideas about your genius? Please share!


References
  • [1] I'm leading a marketing study group using Middleton's Action Plan Marketing workbook, and we just did the meme section. I'm still working on mine, but they alll have to do with smart people, and helping turn their ideas/inspiration into action.
Tuesday
Nov202007

A conversation with Sally McGhee, productivity pioneer and author of "Take Back Your Life"

Continuing my interview series with the top experts in personal productivity comes another deep and wide-ranging conversation, this time with Sally McGhee, CEO of McGhee Productivity Solutions and author of Take Back Your Life!: Using Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 to Get Organized and Stay Organized.

If her name sounds familiar, that's no surprise. Her book is one of Amazon's best sellers in categories like Outlook and E-mail. And her experience and knowledge in the field go back twenty years - she was a partner in a company with David Allen, where she helped formulate the essential ideas of modern productivity practices like GTD (which she's taken in significant new directions - more below), and has worked with luminaries like Tony Buzan [1]. She's also an active Microsoft partner and contributor [2].

I'm very happy to share highlights from our delightful conversation. Enjoy!


Getting started in the field

Sally started out in her early teens in London, working with inspiring people like Buckminster Fuller, Tony Buzan [1], and Michael Wolf, who ran a corporate identity company. It was Michael who suggested that she was so organized, she ought to get into the business. She took this to heart and in her early 20s created a company that produced a paper-based time management system, one that she says was futuristic and included features like mind-mapping pages.

She sold that company, did coaching work with Jinny Ditzler [3] at a company called Results Unlimited (prior to its becomming Best Year Yet), and started a similar company in the US. She sold that company to work with Russell Bishop [4], who hired her and David Allen to work as a team [5]. Finally, they closed the company, with David and her parting ways. He created Getting Things Done, and Sally went on to found McGhee Productivity Solutions. (Check out their workflow model - it has some surprises, esp. around integrating goals. More on this below.)

Sally said working with these people (esp. Fuller) crafted what she calls her "psychological aspects in becoming a global citizen." This led to an early and continuing urge to make an impact, which she wanted to do in the corporate world, where she saw a need for education (it's where most people continue on-going learning after leaving school). I respect that she's taken many steps to move her closer to her goal.


Personal productivity and its larger implications

As I continue getting to know leaders like Sally, and as I get deeper into the field, I'm struck that it quickly explodes into every part of life [6]. Sally agreed, and says she's as much a student of life today than she's ever been. She continues to explore how to improve the quality of life for herself, her neighbors, her community, and the people her company interacts with in the corporate world.

She says this helps her in leading the field by redefining the meaning of productivity in the corporate world. It has to do with sustainability and values, starts with their Take Back Your Life training, but expands into programs that deal with how to create what she calls "sustainable cultures that combine increased performance with and work/life balance." This involves determining what processes need to be changed, and creating objectives that cascade down and up. It all connects to the four values she teaches - alignment, focus, integrity and accountability. (She cites Megatrends 2010: The Rise of Conscious Capitalism as a good source around this topic.)


The progression of clients from workflow to values

I asked Sally about whether clients come to her seeking these higher levels, or just dealing with the daily overload. She says that initially her clients come to them because they have a level of pain, e.g., around email, misaligned objectives, mergers and acquisitions, or accountability in the culture. Her experience is the larger culture conversations tend to happen at the more senior levels, and that the pain points lower down are around being disorganized. (She rattled off a bunch of symptoms including things falling through the cracks, being overwhelmed, not getting things done, no work/life balance, working too many hours, the kids call their phone, Blackberries, etc. Sound familiar?)

Once her company goes in and does their work, there's often an unexpected surprise where people realize there's a lifestyle change involved (something I've experienced very deeply, and which resulted in a major career change). She says not everyone takes it on, but many do.


Measuring productivity improvements

One area that sets Sally's company apart is their use of quantitative metrics. She says they use them because they want to foster sustainable productivity, not "quick fixes." They measure simple things, but continue creating more advanced levels of them. The simple ones include inbox size (before starting then six weeks after the program), time spent processing email, time spent on activities towards objectives, and time spent working at home. She compares these to more common evaluation forms that give a sense of initial enthusiasm, but don't track longer impact.

They support continued adoption via post-seminar services like webinars (which participants listen to a month afterwards) and before and after surveys. She says the webinar supports attendees in a review process of their system, and gives them an opportunity to acknowledge accomplishments and identify improvement areas.

They have larger programs, as well as products like her book and their Outlook add-in.


Top-down vs. bottom-up

In systems for self-management I've seen two major lines of thought. One is primarily bottom-up, like Allen's. The assumption is you have to get on top of your incoming stuff before you can free up your mind. On the other end of the spectrum is the type popularized by Stephen Covey, i.e., driven by purpose/vision (popularized by the image of climbing the ladder of success only to find it was leaning against the wrong wall).

When I asked Sally her take on this, she gave a good answer: that she doesn't know if there is ever one right answer. She went on to say the organizational context is important. For the most effective and expedient results, she ideally starts with an individual (Executive), then moves down to the team, and then the organization. On the individual level, Sally argues you definitely have to clear your mind in order to be able to see the "wood for the trees." When your email is empty and all your actions are in one place, it is easier to (as Allen puts it) get things done. However, she says there are many people working efficiently, but not getting the right things done - which fits more around the Covey technology.

She went on to talk about four fundamental paradigm shifts that need to take place with people. Her 2007 edition details these; here's my understanding of them:
  1. You must be selective - you are never going to get it all done. It's not about getting everything done, it is about getting the right things done. Then the question becomes, "What are the right things?" These are her Meaningful Objectives which, in her system, drive projects and actions. Questioning whether your actions relate directly to these helps make good decisions and to be selective. She says this moves you from a place of "coping and surviving to causing and thriving." Most of her clients are at the former level.
  2. You must manage your life from the calendar, not the to-do list. This is because the to-do list is infinite, the calendar is not. (This a consistent with Mark Forster's ideas around closed lists - see Do it tomorrow.) This gets you thinking about boundaries and limits, where people get the reality of, "Oh, my god, I can't put a 15-pound sugar bag into a 5-pound space." :-) Her book describes the weekly process of choosing which actions to move to the calendar. These are the ones you're absolutely committed to doing that week.
  3. You must make yourself as important as other people. This is important because we often feel that we must react to others' needs, thinking that's the only way to make a difference. This leads to not honoring those actions or time blocks we've made with ourselves (i.e., agreements). She says this isn't selfish because the individual's objectives should be aligned with the organization's objectives.
  4. You must be proactive, not reactive. She describes this in terms of trading instant gratification or a reaction for larger goals, and of standing back to do course corrections (reviewing and planning).
She finished by saying not all individuals or organizations are ready for these shifts.


Outlook, working with Microsoft

Unlike Allen's system, Sally works solely with Outlook. She says she saw Outlook as one of the best tools for implementing productivity improvements, what she calls an Integrated Management System. Her first consideration wasn't the market share (at the time it wasn't at the top), but the program's sophistication and potential. But she says her company is not just about the technology - they use technology "as a tool for helping people sustain long-term change by daily practice within the software. So the software does make a difference." Of course now that the program is the de facto corporate standard (with world-wide distribution) she's in a strong position.


Getting clients

Her clients initially came via referral, as a result of producing value in people's lives, but of course the book now generates a lot of business. In addition they use their webinars, software, PR, and their Microsoft relationship to open up enterprise accounts - their primary market.


Networking

Not surprisingly, Sally said networking is extraordinarily important because it creates community, which she thinks is required to make an impact. As puts it, "Things just happen more easily that way, and more quickly. There's more learning to be done, there's more contribution to be made. It moves it from 'either/or' to 'and'." She said she had to work on the networking piece, but getting through any personal discomfort was well worth it.


Biggest success factors

She described a number of factors, including: working with an amazing team of people - picking great people who are really committed; walking the talk (practicing the principles they teach); and communicating authentically, straight, taking a powerful stance for your vision, and not backing down.

She says her personal success has to do with having a vision and walking towards it. But the success comes from a group of people "who have tremendous heart and tremendous vision, and who work the process inside the company."


Future plans

She plans to write a thought-leadership book next year about cultural change and how to sustain what she calls "true productivity" - performance without sacrificing work/life balance, and supporting operating from values. It will be based on their experience with programs that are creating now, i.e., case studies with real examples. Sally wants it to be a larger-scale how-to book, separate from software.


Thanks, Sally!



References
Tuesday
Nov132007

Some tasty morsels from the Ideamatt self help formulary

A light post this week, I wanted to share a few select formulas for productivity and self help I've been collecting. Hopefully some will resonate. Let's hear yours! -- matt

Event + Response = Outcome
From The Success Principles [1]

Flow = Work + Play
From Psychologists now know what makes people happy

Productivity = What x When
From Nicholas Bate On being productive

Effectiveness = Creativity x Order
From Do it tomorrow

Effectiveness = Knowledge x Focus
From Nick Duffill via Eric Mack

Luck = Preparation + Opportunity
From To Do Doing Done

Productivity = Clarity - Interruptions + Rested
From My Productivity Equation is C - I + R = P. What's Yours?

Productivity = Value / Time (where Value = Impact x Endurance x Essence x Volume)
From What Is Productivity?

Intention + Commitment = Reality
From The Instant Productivity Toolkit

The "Worth It" factor = Effort * Fulfillment * "Necessity/right-thing-to-do factor"
From CrazyBusy

Success = Work + Play + "Keep your mouth shut"
From Albert Einstein

Talent x Relationships = Productivity ("the success formula that never fails")
From Time Power

Life = The people you meet + What you create together
A gem from Networking Tips from the White House

And finally (and appropriately) - from The End:
And, in the end, the love you take
Is equal to the love you make.

References
Thursday
Nov082007

An interview with Chris Crouch, creator of the GO System

Continuing my interview series [1] with the top experts in personal productivity, I'm very pleased to share highlights from my conversation with Chris Crouch, creator of the GO System and author of Getting Organized: Learning How to Focus, Organize and Prioritize. Chris's company runs a certification program and sells products like an implementation kit. You can find some of his articles here.

I wrote about Chris's book a few months ago (see Some thoughts from the book "Getting Organized" by Chris Crouch), and I'm grateful he took time to share from his deep and wide-ranging knowledge and interests. So if you like big ideas and lots of great book references, enjoy!


Getting started in the field

Chris got his start somewhat by accident. He was a CPA in a big eight firm, which had a rigorous working environment and required employees to handle a lot in order to survive (sound familiar?) He soon realized he needed to change his old way of doing things, which wasn't working. That lead to his studying the field of personal productivity, which he naturally took to.

This eventually brought him to the attention of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, who asked him to teach others. They made him an executive in the company, with carte blanche to go anywhere, do anything, and get any resources needed (books, or tapes, or new hires) to sift out the ideas that made the most sense.

He says it's been a long journey, but it stared with a passion, rather than being a job or hobby. I love how he put it: It was something that I couldn't stop studying if I wanted to. Exactly!


Influences and models

Some influential thinkers of Chris's:You'll note there aren't many traditional organizing books here. Chris owns books like those too, but points out that people who need help aren't likely to read a 300 page book on organizing.


Challenges to getting organized

Chris talked a lot about personal issues standing in the way of being productive, what he likens to a Gordian knot. He claims you have to untie it one piece at a time. Some tools he recommends to deal with psychological issues are Transactional analysis and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy.

In his book he writes about six reasons people get disorganized [2], and points out that dealing incoming items (e.g., paper, calls, emails) is the one most books address, though it's not the real issue. He says getting down into personality issues is where you can really do some good. Chris gives procrastination as a good example, with at least a dozen causes. (One of the primary ones is perfectionism, which he claims usually goes back to childhood experiences of trying to get it too right, where the price of a making mistakes is too high.)

To balance the seriousness of these big issues, Chris encourages an attitude of having fun unravelling them - of understand ourselves better.


Top-down vs. bottom-up approaches

I asked Chris about the idea that some advocates promote - that most of us are too overloaded with the day-to-day influx and commitments to think about bigger issues. David Allen is best known for this, and compares it to more "top-down" philosophies like Stephen Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People which stress starting from purpose and vision, then drilling down to projects and action.

I was surprised that he emphatically disagrees with this. Chris uses a puzzle-solving exercise to show how vision is essential. In this problem, you randomly mix the pieces of a child's puzzle and put it together. He identifies three approaches: 1) Randomly pick up pieces and try to fit them together (what I'd call brute-force search), 2) lay the pieces out and look for patterns (color, shape, pattern, etc.), and 3) look at the picture on the box. :-)

Which is better? The first is possible (see the Infinite monkey theorem) but makes you ... well, a monkey. The second is an improvement, and applies what Fritz calls a Current Assessment. But the third starts with a vision, which Chris says is the best. In other words, "Where do I want to go?" is the Fritz's Clear Vision, "Where am I now?" is the Current Assessment, and the final step is an action plan.

He says claiming starting bottom-up is a false economy, akin to the Tortoise and the Hare story. There are rare exceptions where the vision doesn't come first - acute situations requiring immediate attention (a fire or injury, say) - something many of us are in perpetually - but he says we should quickly calm down to work back up to the higher levels.


Getting clients

To build a practice, Chris found what works best is to do 30 minute preview presentations (lunch & learns) at company meetings. This works well because the audience gets to see your content, gets to experience it, and get to experience you. Doing these programs removes the two fears potential clients have in bringing in someone new - content that might not be good, and a speaker who doesn't motivate - either of which can make the sponsor look bad.

In addition, he wrote many white papers and got them published quickly. NAPO was one of his big target markets, so he wrote about what it takes to be successful in the organizing business, and how to develop business clients. He says these papers help ensure that only serious prospects would call: they have taken the time to read 20 pages, which filters out those less interested. This means he's reduced the odds of wasting time on the others. (Seems a nice application of The 80/20 Principle.)


Staying on top of the field

Continued learning about personal productivity is something Chris loves, what he calls increasing his profound knowledge. Chris tracks news, books, and ideas using a hybrid paper/electronic system. Everything, regardless of storage form, is indexed by Paper Tiger software. He enters titles, notes, and keywords for the items, then uses the system to search for related work as needed. The program then spits out a filing code indicating where the information is stored. (My big-arse text file does this, albeit in a seat-of-the-pants manner. But the point is to use something that works.)

He's also a fan of taking concepts apart using mind mapping [3]. He says the process helps extract the usable insights, and helps him digest and play with them for a while. After doing this, he says it's smarter than your memory - it's starting to get encoded in your brain.


The importance of networking

Chris started his business by applying concepts from The Tipping Point (summary here). He asked two of his best friends to learn his system, use it for a few weeks, and if they liked it, to help spread the word. As a result, they connected Chris with influential people in their companies, and the work spread. Once he had a small base of supporters, it started to feed on itself and led to people who heard about him becoming new clients - viral marketing. He points out he's never made a cold call.


Mythology, passion, and having a calling

I asked Chris about his biggest factors in his success, and he was very clear: his personal passion overrides everything. He says operating from your passion is what people notice and are attracted to. This idea led to a discussion of Joseph Campbell, and the The Hero's Journey, of which Chris is a big fan.

He calls the journey a template for life, the opposite of Thoreau's "quiet desperation" [4]. Chris says most people haven't found their true calling in life, or they know it but refuse it. And the template says the result is either life will dry up for you, or you will get kicked back out into the real adventure. "You'll get fired or something like that." (Or quit :-)

To learn more, he recommends starting with The Writer's Journey by Christopher Vogler.


Major Overhauls vs. small steps

We talked about whether big productivity improvements can come from small steps, or if the "one big push" approach (which David Allen's book describes) is better. In his experience the piecemeal approach (a little here and there) doesn't work near as well as taking a big breath and doing it over a day or two. He says once you do that you are less likely to let it slip back out of order - it taps into it feeling so good.

His thought is that if you are ready to "end the clutter madness," to go into your office and gut it: Take everything out except the furniture, then put back only the things that really need to be there. And be ruthless about what goes back in there.


Email

Chris says approaches to handle email have to consider the personal component. He doesn't see books on the topic addressing the underlying issues - they only deal with the symptoms. For example, none ask "Why would someone come into their office and turn their time, energy, and focus toward answering emails, when they know they have much higher priority work?" This connects to the above discussion about challenges in getting organized.

He thinks little hacks (e.g., setting alarms) are fine, but a serious email problem that's eating up all of your time requires a radical intervention he calls truncation [5]: Cut out email entirely for one month. By making it unavailable, your nervous system will adjust to not having it. When you bring it back up, give only certain people your email address, and start fresh.

(Note: He likes the book Bit Literacy: Productivity in the Age of Information and E-mail Overload by Mark Hurst.)


Personal workload capacity

(Refer to the graphic below in the following discussion.) Chris recommends we don't overload ourselves, and demonstrates with his workload capacity graph [6]. The horizontal axis represents time, the vertical one stands for workload, and the green line in the middle (from left to right) is your workload capacity - the maximum workload you're comfortable with.

Most people operate like the red wave - sometimes the workload is above their capacity, but its OK because sometimes it's below. Others operate in the severely overloaded mode - the blue wave. This is a hopeless situation where they are always above their capacity. A final possibility is to work totally below the line, but occasionally touch it at the highest point in the cycle (the yellow wave).

That's where Chris lives.

He stays way below his capacity on purpose, and doesn't over-promise. He claims it eliminates a lot of these issues other people have. For example, by not over-scheduling he has flexibility to handle interruptions (and opportunities, like talking to me), and can more easily be present with people he works with. He says they're often surprised he's available and willing to take time to talk.

crouch-sines

(This led to a discussion about flow, and what we can do to work within - or increase - our capacity. I won't go into that here, but refer to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's - pronounced "ME-high CHICK-sent-me-high-ee" - oft-mentioned book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience for detail. There's a nice visual summary in this article.)


Final tip on productivity

I asked Chris to give one final suggestion about being more productive, and he referred again to Joseph Campbell's advice to "Follow your bliss." He says a lot of people wouldn't understand what that has to do with productivity, but it's the ultimate answer. Chris followed this up with another Campbell quote, "Where you stumble, there is your treasure." (This from his interview by Michael Toms, An Open Life.)

Here's how Chris put it:
If you get on a true path that is in alignment with your calling, a lot of these other little things will fall by the wayside. And when you do that, that means you don't spend too much time, effort, or energy on things that aren't congruent with that path. It fixes almost everything.

References
Wednesday
Nov072007

A discussion with Chris Crouch, creator of the GO System - Part 1

Continuing my interview series [1] with the top experts in personal productivity, I'm very pleased to share highlights from my conversation with Chris Crouch, creator of the GO System and author of Getting Organized: Learning How to Focus, Organize and Prioritize. Chris's company runs a certification program and sells products like an implementation kit. You can find some of his articles here.

I wrote about Chris's book a few months ago (see Some thoughts from the book "Getting Organized" by Chris Crouch), but frankly I had no clue about the depth of his understanding around that and many other topics. Luckily, they came up in our long and wide-ranging conversation - passion, the human nervous system, why getting productive is so hard, mythology, and more. So if you like big ideas and lots of great book references, enjoy!

(Note: Because there's so much interesting stuff, I've broken the interview into two relatively arbitrary parts. Stop by next week for the conclusion.)


Getting started in the field

Chris got his start somewhat by accident. He was a CPA in a big eight firm, which had a rigorous working environment and required employees to handle a lot in order to survive. (Not much different from these days!) Chris soon realized he needed to change his old way of doing things, which wasn't working. That lead to his studying the field of personal productivity, which he naturally took to. This in turn brought him to the attention of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, who asked him to teach it to others. They made him an executive in the company, with carte blanche to go anywhere, do anything, and get any resources (books, or tapes, or new hires) to sift out the ideas that made the most sense. He says it's been a long journey, but it stared with a passion, rather than being a job or hobby. I love how he put it: It was something that I couldn't stop studying if I wanted to. Exactly!


Influences and models

Some of these thinkers were early influences:You'll note there aren't many traditional organizing books here. Chris owns many of these as well, but points out that people who need help aren't likely to read a 300 page book on organizing. (This focus on the practical is a theme of his.)


Challenges in getting organized

Chris talked a lot about personal issues standing in the way of being productive, what he likens to a Gordian knot. He claims you have to untie it one piece at a time. Some tools he recommends to deal with psychological issues are Transactional analysis and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy.

In his book he writes about six reasons people get disorganized [2], and points out that dealing incoming items (e.g., paper, calls, emails) is the one most books address, though it's not the real issue. (And yes, this includes Getting Things Done.) He says getting down into personality issues is where you can really do some good. Chris gives procrastination as a good example, with at least a dozen causes. One of the primary ones is perfectionism, which he claims usually goes back to childhood experiences of trying to get it too right, where the price of a making mistakes is too high.

He has a similar take on books on handling email (he likes Bit Literacy: Productivity in the Age of Information and E-mail Overload by Mark Hurst). But what he doesn't see these books doing is addressing the underlying issues; he says they only deal with the symptoms. For example, none ask "Why would someone come into their office and turn their time, energy, and focus toward answering emails when they know they have got much higher priority work?"

To balance the seriousness of these big issues, Chris encourages an attitude of having fun unravelling them - of understand ourselves better.


On top-down vs. bottom-up approaches

I asked Chris about the idea that "bottom-up" advocates promote - that most of us are too overloaded with the day-to-day influx and commitments to think about bigger issues. David Allen is best known for this, and compares it to more "top-down" philosophies like Stephen Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People which stress starting from purpose and vision, then drilling down to projects and action.

I was surprised that he emphatically disagrees with this, and uses the analogy of solving a simple puzzle to show how vision is essential. In this exercise there are three approaches to working the puzzle: 1) Randomly pick up pieces and try to fit them together (what I'd call a brute-force search), 2) lay the pieces out and look for patterns (color, shape, pattern, etc.), and 3) look at the picture on the box. :-)

Which is better? The first is possible (see the Infinite monkey theorem) but makes you a monkey. The second is an improvement, and apparently applies what Fritz calls a Current Assessment. But the third starts with a vision, which he says is the best. In other words, "Where do I want to go?" is the Clear Vision, "Where am I now?" is the Current Assessment, and the final step is an action plan.

He says claiming starting bottom-up is a false economy, akin to the Tortoise and the Hare story. There are rare exceptions where the vision doesn't come first - acute situations requiring immediate attention (a fire or injury, say), something many of us are in perpetually - but he says we must quickly calm down and work back up to the higher levels.


On getting clients

Chris found that what works best is to do 30 minute preview presentations (Lunch & Learns), say at company meetings. This works well because the audience gets to see your content, gets to experience it, and get to experience you. Doing these programs removes the two fears potential clients have in bringing in someone new - content that might not be good, and a speaker who doesn't motivate.

In addition, he wrote many White Papers and immediately got them published. NAPO was one of his big target markets, so he wrote about what it takes to be successful in the organizing business, and how to develop business clients. He says these papers help ensure only serious prospects call - they've taken the time to read 20 pages, which filters out those less interested. This means he's reduced the odds of wasting time on the others. (Seems a nice application of The 80/20 Principle.)


On staying on top of the field

Staying on top of the field is something Chris loves, what he calls increasing his profound knowledge. Chris tracks news, books, and ideas on his own (no assistants), and uses a hybrid paper/electronic system. Everything, regardless of storage form, is indexed by Paper Tiger software (see my take here). He enters titles, notes, and keywords for journals, files (digital and paper), then uses the system to search for related items as needed. The program then spits out a code indicating where the information is stored. (My big-arse text file does this, albeit in a seat-of-the-pants manner. But the point is to use something that works.)

He's also a fan of taking a concept apart using mind mapping. He says the process helps extract the usable insights, and helps him digest and play with them for a while. He uses Mindjet as the mapping tool. After doing this, he says it's smarter than your memory - it's starting to get encoded in your brain.


References